Reader-submitted complaint: Can you say somewhere that I wasn't the one who complained about your disclaimer? I'm not actually a lawyer, everyone! Not yet, anyway!
I don't think anyone thinks it was you. Well, I could be wrong: I do have some readers who are a bit weird. And I mean that in the nicest possible way.
Reader-submitted complaint, continued: Tibetan monks might think it was me.
Tibetan monks?
Okay. Let the record show that the person who complained about the disclaimer is an honest-to-goodness graduate of a law school. He's probably thrilled that his keen legal arguments have so much traction here on the blog.
Saturday, October 13, 2007
So close, no matter how far
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I see we've (and by we I mean Megan) gone back to selective posting of reader-complaints. There is considerable context to the conversation that has gone unreported. I think this may be done to provoke this kind of response.
I had already been mistaken for the capitalist, it was quite reasonable for people to think that I would be the lawyer who would pay too much attention to language.
As for the Tibetan Monks comment, now who is humour impaired? I was assured that NOBODY thought I was the lawyer. HMMM, nobody? Really, can you speak for the mind of everybody, including tibetan monks?
Glen> Me me me me me me. ME! Me me me me me me me.
Yikes. Anonymous was ME. I clicked the wrong button. Sorry.
Post a Comment