Please join us at

Get the posts on my new blog by e-mail. Enter your e-mail address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

New posts on

Saturday, October 13, 2007

So close, no matter how far

Reader-submitted complaint: Can you say somewhere that I wasn't the one who complained about your disclaimer? I'm not actually a lawyer, everyone! Not yet, anyway!

I don't think anyone thinks it was you. Well, I could be wrong: I do have some readers who are a bit weird. And I mean that in the nicest possible way.

Reader-submitted complaint, continued: Tibetan monks might think it was me.

Tibetan monks?

Okay. Let the record show that the person who complained about the disclaimer is an honest-to-goodness graduate of a law school. He's probably thrilled that his keen legal arguments have so much traction here on the blog.


Glen said...

I see we've (and by we I mean Megan) gone back to selective posting of reader-complaints. There is considerable context to the conversation that has gone unreported. I think this may be done to provoke this kind of response.

I had already been mistaken for the capitalist, it was quite reasonable for people to think that I would be the lawyer who would pay too much attention to language.

As for the Tibetan Monks comment, now who is humour impaired? I was assured that NOBODY thought I was the lawyer. HMMM, nobody? Really, can you speak for the mind of everybody, including tibetan monks?

Anonymous said...

Glen> Me me me me me me. ME! Me me me me me me me.

Megan said...

Yikes. Anonymous was ME. I clicked the wrong button. Sorry.